Konference: 2007 49th ASH Annual Meeting - účast ČR
Kategorie:
Maligní lymfomy a leukémie
Téma: Postery
Číslo abstraktu: 3547
Autoři: MD Heinz Gisslinger; Robert Kralovics, PhD; Mirjana Gotic; Jerzy Holowiecki; prof. MUDr. Miroslav Penka, CSc.; Rudolf Widmann; Petro E. Petrides
The ANAHYDRET study group involving 27 centers in 11 countries,
sponsored by the AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, initiated a
prospective randomized single blind multicenter phase III trial in
order to compare efficacy and tolerability of anagrelide with
hydroxyurea in high risk ET patients diagnosed according to the WHO
classification. The study was designed as a non-inferiority trial
as the limited number of treatment nave ET patients available and
the expected low number of ET related events following treatment
with a cytoreductive therapy would not have allowed the conduct of
a conventional superiority trial. At the stage of final analysis
258 patients with high risk ET previously untreated, were
randomized to receive anagrelide (n=122, median age 58,1 years,
rage 19-90 years; 46 male, 76 female) or to receive hydroxyurea
(n=136, median age 56,4 years, range 22-83 years, 47 male, 89
female). Anagrelide, a novel non-immediate release formulation, was
started with a dose of 1mg/day and hydroxyurea was initiated using
a dose of 1500mg/day. Confirmatory proof of non inferiority of
anagrelide after 6 months therapy (short term objective) was
achieved based on predefined equivalence criteria for the course of
platelet and white cell counts, hemoglobin levels, (difference of
+/- 10% within CI 95%), and for the rate of ET related events (Odds
ratio >0,404, medium sized difference corresponding to Cohenss
standardized difference of 0.5). Neutrophile counts remained
unchanged in the anagrelide arm but were significantly reduced by
hydroxyurea. There was no difference in the number of patients with
at least 1 adverse event between the anagrelide treated group (73%)
and the hydroxyurea treated group (73%). Five patients were
discontinued in each group because of adverse events. However, the
results showed an advantage of anagrelide over hydroxyurea
concerning leukopenia and flue like symptoms while the angrelide
treated patients had more frequently tachycardia, palpitations and
headache. The final data analysis after 12 months therapy revealed
that non- inferiority of anagrelide compared to hydroxyurea with
regard to the platelet lowering effect, hemoglobin levels and ET
related symptoms was maintained (p<0,025). During the entire
study period of 12 months, 8 major ET related complications
occurred in the anagrelide arm (2 myocardial infarctions, 1
coronary arterial disease, 1 peripheral arterial disease, 1
mesenteric vein thrombosis and 3 bleedings) and also 8 major events
were seen in the hydroxyurea arm (1 myocardial infarction, 1
peripheral arterial disease, 1 stroke, 1 pulmonary embolism, 2 deep
vein thromboses and 2 bleedings). Twenty two minor ET related
events occurred in the anagrelide arm as compared to 23 such events
in the hydroxyurea arm. The frequency of adverse events and
withdrawals remained balanced in both treatment arms at the stage
of final analysis after 12 months therapy. In addition, all these
parameters will also be analysed with respect to the JAK2 mutation.
In summary the study provides evidence for non-inferiority of
anagrelide compared to hydroxyurea in the treatment of ET diagnosed
according to the WHO classification.
Abstract #3547 appears in Blood, Volume 110, issue 11, November 16,
2007
Keywords: Myeloproliferative Disorder|Thromboembolic
Events|Anagrelide
Disclosure: Research Funding: Clinical research is partly funded by
AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals.
Honoraria Information: Speakers honoraria from AOP Orphan
Pharmaceuticals.
Monday, December 10, 2007 5:00 PM
Session Info: Poster Session: Myeloproliferative Syndromes: Therapy
(5:00 p.m.-7:00 p.m.)
Datum přednesení příspěvku: 10. 12. 2007