Konference: 2010 35th Congress ESMO – účast ČR
Kategorie: Podpůrná onkologická léčba, výživa nemocných a ošetřovatelská péče
Téma: Supportive Care
Číslo abstraktu: 1238PD
Autoři: J. Maenpaa; P. Sevelda; MUDr. Martin Šmakal; A. Trojan; J. Puertas; M. Schwenkglenks; F.L.G. Erdkamp; Zsolt Szabo; K. Bendall; K. Krzemieniecki
Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in Europe, Australia and Canada. Adults with breast, ovarian, small-cell or non-small cell lung cancers (SCLC and NSCLC) initiating any CT regimen were eligible, if physicians assessed them to be at větší-rovno20% risk of FN (per EORTC guidelines). G-CSF use was recorded. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of FN in cycles 1-8.
Results: Of the 1370 patients enrolled between 12/2007 and 10/2009, 1347 were analyzed. Most patients had breast cancer (Table). The most common CT agents were taxanes in breast cancer (70%), platinum in NSCLC (79%), platinum+etoposide in SCLC (74%) and platinum+paclitaxel in ovarian cancer (55%). Breast cancer patients were relatively young with early stage disease; they received more G-CSF primary prophylaxis than those with other tumours. FN incidence was highest in the SCLC group. Relative dose intensity was lower in lung and ovarian cancers. Neutropenia was a frequent reason for dose delays in all tumours.
Conclusions: Patient factors seemed to be a key determinant of high FN risk assessment in NSCLC and ovarian cancer, whereas breast cancer patients were undergoing curative CT. Despite patients being deemed high risk for FN, G-CSF primary prophylaxis was relatively infrequent and varied by tumour. Physicians appeared more willing to accept CT dose modifications in lung and ovarian cancers than in breast cancer. Sponsor: Amgen Europe (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00883181)
n (%) [95% CI] | Breast cancer (N=829) | NSCLC (N=224) | SCLC (N=137) | Ovarian (N=157) |
Median age (range), years | 52 (18-82) | 62 (28-83) | 62 (42-81) | 62 (25-84) |
Age ≥65 years | 136 (16%) | 96 (43%) | 51 (37%) | 71 (45%) |
Advanced stage* | 90 (11%) | 126 (56%) | 98 (72%) | 122 (78%) |
Prior CT/RT | 41 (5%) | 59 (26%) | 35 (26%) | 34 (22%) |
Any G-CSF PP | 457 (55%) | 45 (20%) | 44 (32%) | 31 (20%) |
Pegfilgrastim PP | 393 (47%) | 22 (10%) | 33 (24%) | 24 (15%) |
Any reactive G-CSF | 197 (24%) | 59 (26%) | 37 (27%) | 44 (28%) |
Reactive pegfilgrastim | 101 (12%) | 16 (7%) | 16 (12%) | 16 (10%) |
No G-CSF | 175 (21%) | 120 (54%) | 56 (41%) | 82 (52%) |
FN (cycles 1-8) | 77 (9%) [7, 11] | 18 (8%) [5, 12] | 0 (15%) [10, 21] | 12 (8%) [4, 13] |
RDI ≥85% | 714 (86%) [84, 88] | 133 (59%) [53, 66] | 91 (66%) [58, 74] | 109 (69%) [62, 76] |
*Breast cancer and NSCLC: stage IV; SCLC: extensive; ovarian: stage III-IV. PP, primary prophylaxis: G-CSF initiated in cycle 1 between days 1-7, or by day 12 if chemotherapy extended beyond day 7. Reactive G-CSF: use of G-CSF other than PP (ie. secondary prophylaxis, treatment). RDI, Relative dose intensity (vs planned). RT, radiotherapy
Disclosure: J. Maenpaa: Member of IMPACT SOLID steering
committee. Member of MSD-Schering Plough advisory board on ovarian
cancer (Finland); P. Sevelda, M. Smakal, A. Trojan, J. Puertas,
F.L.G. Erdkamp and K. Krzemieniecki: Member of IMPACT SOLID
steering committee; M. Schwenkglenks: Research funding from Amgen
(Europe) GmbH. Member of Amgen advisory boards and IMPACT SOLID
steering committee; Z. Szabo: Amgen employee and stock holder; K.
Bendall: Amgen employee.
Datum přednesení příspěvku: 9. 9. 2010